I am glad the commoners stood up for themselves, I thought that issue was going to go a bit differently.

Glad they don't emphasis too much on the commoners x nobles trope. I've already seen too much of that in other anime.

Kami tachi is a wholesome anime smh.
I already am on the stance to purge all nobles(including real life nobles like george soroz),except kami tachi ones cause they're sweet and wholesome.

I already said enough,so i'll only be repeating what i already said.
But since you were interested in my TL;DR,here is full version:
Only kami tachi wa hirowareta otoko nobles(that Ryoma met) are worth sparing as their moral value is around 90% which is almost at full perfection,according to what anime shown. Adopting a homeless young boy,helping him adapt to society,making him grow,drytron negating all negativity and many more good things that show us "they're pure by heart".
I dont consider saving anyone who is like Gates = NWO promotor,pizza gate culprit,wants to jail humanity in megacities(in C40 cities to be exact) or Rotschild = NWO promotor,pizza gate culprit,pours tons of cash in non-profit organisations to kill or ruin everyone opposing NWO or even Musk = NWO promotor,takes cash from user's paypal accounts at a whim,hates fiction which is shown by censoring fictional drawing tags and fictional drawings on twitter that he owns.
Nuke war is deserved so USA,Germany,France,Britain,Russia and other NWO promotors will experience the real life and become pure or get purged within the war.
China is powerfull and endless enough to destroy Russia,USA and Europe together,with use of ISLAM and conquering Poland via coup d'etat(and making laws that boost PR) the South Asian Alliance wont be able to be penetrated,as silk road can be completed easily.
Why i dont consider China as NWO promotor is because: They can destroy NWO if they want and become sole superpower in the world,or even duo superpower with their ally,if Europe is too far away. If they would get together with JP for technology and quality,then they can even research succesfully psychic abilities.
Summing up with Yami Yugi words:
"SAA,geemu no jikan da." (RTS)

"...broad senseless wrath aimed at all of humanity..." Ah,another one,this time it seems you're USA related going by which indoctrination was put inside you by the nobles.

Nobles, stars, rich or others.

We usually tend to hear about them only from the bad grass of the group...

Nobles and stars are different and its a BIG topic u touched,here is example what happens with the stars:
Drama boosts popularity but... it also boosts hate.
Example from virtual youtuber sphere:
Pikamee was victim of trannies rage,for a thing she didnt do,result? Trannies both boosted her popularity and sent her death threats that made her graduate.
Though with pikamee past im surprised she didnt grow as tough as me,since we both have same type of school past.
---
Here is example what happens with the nobles of our world(like politicians and bankers):
Bad decision > gets popularized > people realise its a bad decision > people grow to hate them more.
Good decision > gets popularized > people remember the person's bad decision streak > people are GIGA suspicious > people look if it have bad consequences in the future for themselves > if yes = hate for nobles
>>>
For example: Making A.I. into something that rules humans will kill all of the humanity,as much as making androids that are more than just personal assistants/maids/wives will wage war against humankind and ultimately elliminate it. Beware of evolutionary algorithms inside androids.

And don't worry about AI, we are very far from having an autonomous AI, we can just give the appearance of intelligence for now, not a real AI like in science fiction.

We're not that far,better to regulate dystopia before it happens.
Only limitations AI needs is:
a) Not used in war
b) Not dictating human life

The most advanced AI, is just an automated google, and needs a data center to function.
We are far from I, Robot.

We use "AI", but we should use "advanced algorithm" instead, not one of our AIs currently has intelligence.

I agree, we need to talk about it before we get to that level, if it's possible...
And that's what we're doing.

One of the problems is that politicians rarely understand scientists...

And that lack of understanding and desire to do evil that politicians have will be world-ending.

stars / influencers can also destroy the life of someone or a brand or anything just by their words without any proof, this is the common point with the noble.

I know this because of how gigguk was shittin on harem,ecchi and that was heavily reduced because of his hate but they dont deserve same treatment as nobles.
You can become accidental star,like Dream. That later on was drama removed by nobles.
But becoming an accidental noble? The chance for it is 0%,literally null. Nobles gatekeep themselves so they're easy to identify and purge,just sort the top 1000 richest people in the world and sort their direct connections out as they are co-culprits.

I think you fail to understand what it is to be a nobel. This whole trope of people of high born status using it to look down on the peasantry is rubbish. At least from the British pov. It is in fact the aristocracy that restricted the power of the monarchy. It is the nobel who raised armies to fight against the tyrany of the monarchy. The problem arises when a noble forgets who they are. Which is someone that certainly for the English risked their life and fought to establish the foundation of which the benefits their descendants would enjoy. The sole mission and objective of their descendants if they are to honour the memory of their ancestors is to ensure not only the longevity of what they have inherited, but to also build upon it. That is why the whole fairy tale of a person not from that background marrying to become a princess is foolish. If a noble is to enjoy what they have, they must forgo certain privileges the rest of us get to enjoy such as marrying for love. At that point if you want to be like the rest, then give up your title and wealth and build your fortune yourself.

- a person from 1 of England's oldest families.

Imma refuse it with my own words:
Being with a title of the noble(which is commonly known as "nobility" or "being noble") initially may not have ben all that bad,however the years of corruption,moral inferiority,acting on a high horse,evil deeds,increasing the populace's suffering,literal crimes and many more(soroz,rotschild,gates actions included here) built upon the title in a way that we currently know today,which is "rich fduckers acting evil = nobility".
Besides... Marrying for love is obsolete thanks to one of those nobles funding feminism that ultimately shown all men how true this quote is: "women have so many privileges and for their gain are cold blooded enough to throw you into jail with mere false accusation" and also love is just a feeling,you can give your love to inanimate objects too(thats how "passion" games were born alongside studios that make games because they love games),women are not needed here.

Your judgement on this is clouded by content you have consumed and been surrounded by. I am talking about actual history over the course of 1000 years going back to the Charter of Freedoms drawn up by Henry I to address the abuses of power by his brother William Rufas who ruled before him. This charter was a base from which the Magna Carts was later modelled off as it was the Magna Carta that was used as a base for the English Bill of Rights written in the wake of the English civil war which the US bill of rights was heavily inspired by.

There is nothing wrong with feminism. Traditional feminism that is. The issue is 3rd wave feminism.

Not particularly content,because i discern reality from fakeness in 2023 with my very own eyes. I understand that you quoted history,however in 2023 there is no such thing as common sense,you need to do 2 things to know the truth without looking at media: follow the logic and follow the benefits(most common example of benefit: money),this will tell you who's at fault really easily.
There is no need to excuse it with history as the common sense of the history is also obsolete,so current year feminzism is the one that enlightens the men with "government = bad,relationships = bad" while making women cry. :)
To say it in one sentence: They want to do evil,but do good as a side effect,lolololol

3rd wave feminism and true feminism of which JK Rowling supports are very different things. There is a need to differentiate this. Even before WWI with the first rise of feminism there were different factions. Militant/terrorist and those who followed the diplomatic process to see laws changed that would create a level playing field. Of course WWI put a stop to it as and so things voted on in their favour as recognition for being an integral part of the war economy at the time.

Today is in fact 2023 meaning that nobles as you complain about them are a thing of the past. Those with any power in the UK in the form of those in the house of lords serve as a check and balance against any potential rise in populism and intention of democratically elected leaders to erode a part of the democratic process as we have seen in many other countries when populist leaders have been elected.

Rowling is a terf and that wave'ish feminism you wrote about is connected to LGBT and this LGBT is connected to drama+destroying people livelihood and NGO's alike,non government organisations are connected to the people investing in them,which are rich people(our world nobles) who's agenda is being completed as a result of promoting these institutions doing evil stuff. This logic is only possible because there is NEVER an accident or a coincidence when it comes to politics and its an established rule that made so many accurate predictions of the future.

It isnt about populism or history this time. Because even democratically elected leaders can be bought out and are actively being bought out,simplest example of corrupted politicians is chimera political party called "POPIS"(PO + PIS pretending to be enemies but being allies behind the scenes) where you can literally pay them to force any law in the Poland you want or pay more(zelensky is at fault) to promote an offshoot of na`zism,which is called banderism and is even more cruel and evil than real na`zism or you can be Joe Biden and tell these POPIS politicians to buy poisonous moldy wheat from ukraine(source: The Economist) cause his family directly benefits from this.

Those were 2022-2023 examples of the nobles evilness.

Institutions. NGOs. NWOs...

You say a hell of a lot without really saying anything of substance at all.

Humans,similarly to PC's have underflow glitch too,so if you overflow them with information being 99,9999999% true they will turn back into "zero" or "negative values",saying these things for example:
"You say a h**l of a lot without really saying anything of substance at all."

OK back to your previous comment. The end was not an example of nobles. Colonials do not have nobles. They are far to young and immature to understand the concept of it.

Mostly what we have seen as portrayed as nobles is just a hierarchy thing blown way out of proportion. Similar to in Freezing when the 3rd year's all plot against first year's because a 3rd year got beat.

Dont you think that people that have noble privileges in history and people doing same privileges using several tons of cash is the same thing?
Tools differ but everything else is the same.

Noble only ever means in the generational sense. And I am not talking American generational. I mean like Dutch and English Generational. Fortunes made before the US was even established enough to beg the French to help them rebel.

The term Noble as in a way of conducting one's self such as acting in a noble fashion, doing something for a noble cause, it exists because of the code of conduct amongst nobles. Something that existed even into WWII where amongst officers if 1 was captured, their word was all that was required. Well at least the Americans and English upheld that. German POW officers had pretty damn free reign and still maintained their privileges as officers wherever they were kept. I suppose 1 good exception to this is Agincourt only because the number of nobles captured for ransom began to outnumber actual English men on the back line.

"...The term Noble as in a way of conducting one's self such as acting in a noble fashion, doing something for a noble cause..." In current year:
Such as "extermination of human population" or "totalitarianism" or "removal of free will(changing human into biorobot)"...
Adolf and Stalin count as nobles too cause they believed that their reasons are noble.

What constitutes as being noble is not defined by the individual, but as a consensus amongst equals. In war if 1 sude summarily execute prisoners, even before rules of war and engagement were a thing, it was an unspoken agreement of fair and equal treatment with due process. If 1 side went against this unspoken law of noble action, that meant their side to could be subject to such same treatment.

:...What constitutes as being noble is not defined by the individual,..." Tell that to george soroz and co. who act like nobles,all corrupt and evil.

You mean the new money people? Don't make me laugh.

You write like you have soooo much power but you cant even fix NWO these new age nobles try to go for.
And its not just "new money",its also an eternal slavery in underground cities because of the viruses they're developing across the world. Guess who they gonna blame? China.

The discussion is about what constitutes as being a noble. Which is certainly not 1 of these new money people or orgs you keep blithering on about.

If that's what it is about then we're both talking about 2 separate things.
Cause i'm talking about "nobility of the history" doesnt apply to current year,cause current year nobility is all about evil.

Considering the house of lords acts as a check and balance against the pitfalls of democracy in which terrible legislation can just be rammed through in some places (Israel attempted judicial overturn being a good example of this) it very much does apply. It is a branch of English government that is able to focus on the needs of the people and the nation rather than the wants. Democracy is certainly essential and beneficial, but it has its pitfalls. Socrates was made to kill himself for pointing these things out.

The things that you are hyper focused on were just as much an issue at the fall of the Roman Republic when those who achieved monopolies in power and business plotted to overthrow the established and democratic rule of law.

There is a president for everything. History always matters.

First off: Democracy doesnt exist when massmedia exists,cause naturally masses will have massmedia opinion if it is sugarcoated enough. Gigguk making his fans hate anime is the best example of massmedia brainwashing masses to do horrible things,i defended anime back then so i know all the events that transpired. Naturally nobles can pay their way up into the media(and they do that in Poland),sooo...
Democracy that you preach off is just glorified plutocracy.
President can be bought out and coup d'etat can be bought out and practically everything else can be bought out and with CBDC the plutocrats further solidify their ownership of human race.
This much is already deduced since 2012.

I think you missed the point where I stated that democracy clearly has its failings and has done since its very inception back in the days of ancient Greece. It was the failings of democracy that led to the fall of the Roman Republic. It is because of these failings that I have been talking about requirement for checks and balances outside of those whose livelihoods are reliant on the voters.

New money can not ever be considered noble. The actions of those who do good deeds however, who abide by the creed of Noblesse Oblige can do so irrespective of being new money or not. This is to appreciate what they have and that they can use that privilege to better the lives of others. The things you talk about have nothing to do with nobles or being noble as those you continue to blithering on about are self centred individuals only thinking for themselves. Rockefeller equates to being new money only having made it through conning people during and after the civil war and today his family continue to do so through the think tank they established to fool people into thinking monopolies were a perfectly viable and even American concept irrespective of their forebears having been subgect to the trust busting by the likes of Teddy Roosevelt. This shit is nothing new. It all happened back in the Roman Republic just as it is happening today. The largest political, military and economic power brokers working together to fool the little people into thinking they are the good guys as they proceed to plot to cement themselves in power for as long as they can. People who carried out exactly the same actions in making themselves appear to be worldly and philanthropic all as a means to by the love and the votes of the people. This is nothing new and has existed for millennia. Best example of a person of noble character (at least before he went a little bit off the rails) is Marcus Tullius Cicero, Lawyer, senator of Rome, Consol of Rome and 1 considered by many today to be a pillar of stoic philosophy, who fought against the mechanisms of those who wished to undermine the democratic system and steal the power for themselves. A man who fought for his ideals and for the people who inevitably gave his life for what he believed in.

"...I think you missed the point where I stated that democracy clearly has its failings and has done since its very inception back in the days of ancient Greece. It was the failings of democracy that led to the fall of the Roman Republic. It is because of these failings that I have been talking about requirement for checks and balances outside of those whose livelihoods are reliant on the voters..."
Nobles consider themselves this way.
And i think you misunderstand what i mean by "noble" cause good nobles dont exist,"noble" is a title given to people who served the country well back in the dark ages and as such king granted them one of "nobility" titles regardless whether their real personality was noble by your definition or not.
Sure,roman might have anything,they even might had tanks,buuuuuuut... The era of ancient rome was so long ago that you can literally either read or make up anything and it is 50x50 true until timewarp back into ancient rome happens to prove or disprove the theories.
Even current year Bible is not a book that is the same on its release,it was patched multiple times by the catholic church to make sure that paranormal events in it are explained for the commonfolk in the way that benefits the church.
Democracy as it is...
Is just an obsolete system full of flaws and bad routes to occur. I'd rather be willingly ruled by smart(!!!) king that benefits me than a herd of mindless sheep that can be and are actively being exploited for evil and are brainwashed enough to like it,strategic genius is worth 9 million democracies.
This song lyrics describes democracy the easiest way:
"The world has turned
And so many have burned
But nobody is to blame"

You really don't understand just how closely events toward the end of the Roman Republic parallel with events today, do you?

There is a single fact: Russia is not a roman republic. If Putin dies then we get straight up... Wait,nevermind... That's gonna benefit me and China if elderly Biden(or other tool of their group) gets reelected and continue to provoke Chinese with things like banks crashing or worldwide CBDC eradicating USA debt to Chinese,or even USA's unnamed virus in development.
Soooo... Responding to your question:
I dont think it is similar at all and not only because technology is different,but also there is more to it than meets the 2 eyes of a normal human.

Idk how you get the idea I am talking about China or Russia when neither can really be considered to be a democratic republic

Which one of current world countries is democratic for you?

US is honestly the best side by side comparison. In Rome it was understood that wherever you were, if if you stated you were a Citizen of Rome, even if it was outside of the Roman empire you were still under the protection of Rome. This extended into Africa, central Asia and the sub continent. In the Roman Republic, politics became extremely corrupt with the level of which only increasing through the rise of populist figures and easily led, highly partisan people. People who went so far as to attack any on an opposing side of politics in support of those they followed. There was no gerrymandering, yet things were disproportionately favoured toward a particular demographic who could be convinced to support 1 side or another depending who they thought they would profit the most off of. A consul could pardon anyone. Even himself. Happy at least that that hasn't been allowed to happen in the case of Trump. In short, absolutely nothing was in the favour of the people. In the UK today, it is all about how you will be looked after when you leave politics. In the US today however, it is just the same as in Rome. Only instead of outright robbing people, US politicians do it through their legalised system of bribery to allow corpos to convince them to carry out activities and policies in which the only result being the people being left worse off.

So many reasons to give. So little time.

US honestly cant be called democratic,as the political parties use psychological techniques or vote manipulation.
Example: Old geriatric person that should be in house being taken care of won the election.
I just cant treat it seriously,especially because such geriatric poisoned one country using the bad wheat from the other country where his son made such wheat.
I cant really treat it seriously. Trump at least was some brain competition that tried to support america and not be a clown to me(im european).

That is exactly what I just said. Because if the rise of militant partisanship within the Republic coupled with the self indulgence and corruption of the Elite in the Roman Republic. Democracy ceased to exist even before the true fall of the Republic. That, is exactly what I am talking about with parallels between the 2.

For me Trump was promising in terms of wanting to focus on America and to cut funding going into the military and the military complex. But he didn't deliver, got bogged down trying to fight for his wall and was effectively neutered in terms of anything to do with restricting military spending. Dude just wasn't strong enough. And then in the end he pardoned a bunch of criminals and provoked the alt right to attack Capital Hill. I really had hopes for him, but in the end there was only disappointment.

Me: "...Which one of current world countries is democratic for you?..."
You: "...US is honestly the best side by side comparison..."
Me: "...US honestly cant be called democratic..."
You: "...That is exactly what I just said...."
Ok... Ok... Ok... I am bored. *switches channels*

A lot of us do

that's what I like about this anime, everything is all chill and wholesome

Considering this is one of the most chill of Isekai, I doubt there would be any heavy concerns/plots to be had in this show.

School days

I can not read this and not think of that one anime.